Example: Control Design Assessment (Without Validation) The following process flow takes examples of control design assessment to provide a detailed overview of the assessment process. The process operates by means of statuses being issued by the users involved in the different process steps and follow-up tasks consequently being generated.
The following table describes the process flow for control design assessment without validation and with simplified issue remediation (that is, the same person processes the issue and the remediation plan):
Step/Task |
Level(Tab Page) |
Initial Status |
Pushbuttons |
Action /New Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
In the task
|
Assessment |
|
|
When the user chooses
|
Issue |
|
|
The issue status is automatically changed with the assessment status to
|
|
The processor entered for the issue receives the task
|
Assessment |
|
All inactive |
|
Issue |
|
|
Processing without remediation plan: Enter comment and choose
Processing with remediation plan: Create remediation plan and choose
|
|
Remediation plan (only for remediation with issue) |
|
|
After saving, status:
|
|
Processing without remediation plan: The processor entered for the issue receives the task
|
Assessment |
|
All inactive |
|
Issue |
|
|
Where required, enter a comment, change the processor, and choose
|
|
Processing with remediation plan: The person who is the processor of the issue and the remediation plan at the same time receives the task
|
Assessment |
|
All inactive |
|
Issue |
|
All inactive |
||
Remediation Plan |
|
|
Specify the percentage of completion. Where 100% applies, choose
|
|
Valid for both remediation types: The person who reported the issue receives the task
|
Assessment |
|
|
If the reassessment delivers an unsatisfactory result, retain the negative rating, and report a new issue, or reopen the old issue (see below). In both cases, issue remediation is triggered again with the task
|
Issue |
|
|
When
When
|
|
Remediation plan (only for remediation with issue) |
|
|